Education Journal Editors' Perspectives On Self-Plagiarism
Philosophy and Religion
The perspectives of academic journal editors regarding self-plagiarism were examined by means of an online survey in which 277 editors of education journals participated. Following the survey, a sub-sample of 14 editors were interviewed. A substantial majority of editors were found to be in accord with the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the APA in believing that re-use of long, verbatim passages or tables, figures and images from an author’s previously published work without appropriate citation is unethical, and most editors viewed less egregious self-borrowing as wrong also. However, numerous editors expressed unease with the general concept of self-plagiarism, and several of them noted contextual factors that can make limited self-plagiarism acceptable. A clear majority indicated support for a common policy regarding self-plagiarism but had doubts about the feasibility of getting agreement on a comprehensive statement.
Journal of Academic Ethics
Rachal, J. R.
(2015). Education Journal Editors' Perspectives On Self-Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 13-25.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/17273