Historians' Testimony On "Common Knowledge" of the Risks of Tobacco Use: A Review and Analysis of Experts Testifying On Behalf of Cigarette Manufacturers in Civil Litigation

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2006

Department

History

School

Humanities

Abstract

A qualitative analysis of the trial and deposition testimony of professional historians who have testified on behalf of the tobacco industry shows that defence historians present a view of past knowledge about tobacco in which the public was frequently warned that cigarettes were both deadly and addictive over the broad historical period. While defence historians testify to conducting significant levels of independent research, they also draw upon a common body of research conducted by industry counsel to support its litigation efforts. Defence historians unduly limit their research materials, ignoring industry records and, therefore, critically undermine their ability to evaluate industry activity in the smoking and health controversy as it unfolded in historical time. A consequence is that defence historians present a skewed history of the cigarette in which the tobacco industry all but ceases to exist.

Publication Title

Tobacco Control

Volume

15

First Page

107

Last Page

116

Link to Full Text

Find in your library

Share

COinS