In Defense of the Signal Detection Interpretation of Remember/Know Judgments
Donaldson (1996) argued that remember/know judgments can be conceptualized within a signal detection framework by assuming that they are based on two criteria situated along a strength-of-memory decision axis. According to this model, items that exceed a high criterion receive a remember response, whereas items that only exceed a lower criterion receive a know response. Although a variety of findings have been presented in evidence against this idea, Dunn (2004) recently showed that detection theory is fully compatible with those findings. We present a variety of new results and new analyses that weigh strongly in favor of the detection interpretation. We further show that a dual-process account of recognition memory is compatible with a unidimensional detection model despite the common notion that such a model necessarily assumes a single process. The key assumption of this model is that individual recognition decisions are based on both recollection and familiarity (not on one process or the other).
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Wixted, J. T.,
(2004). In Defense of the Signal Detection Interpretation of Remember/Know Judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 616-641.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/3085