•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The integration of technologies such as artificial intelligence, electronic health records, and automated diagnostic systems has significantly altered clinical practice. While these tools enhance efficiency and diagnostic accuracy, they have also introduced new forms of medical error, raising complex questions about responsibility. This article examines the ethical dimensions of accountability in technology-induced harm by evaluating the roles of healthcare providers, technology developers, and hospital systems. Drawing on the four pillars of medical ethics; autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, it explores the overlapping responsibilities of each stakeholder and the challenges that arise when harm occurs. Through analysis of the Therac-25 radiation overdoses and algorithmic bias in AI mammography, the discussion illustrates the limitations of attributing blame to a single actor. Instead, it argues for a shared accountability model that emphasises collaboration, transparent design, comprehensive training, and institutional oversight. As healthcare technologies continue to evolve, so too must ethical frameworks for accountability. A collective approach is essential to ensure patient safety, reduce disparities, and maintain trust in technology-driven healthcare.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.