Abstract
This paper explores the ethical justification for the use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) in patients with intellectual disabilities, particularly in scenarios where patients cannot provide informed consent. The tension between respecting autonomy and ensuring beneficence presents a complex challenge for healthcare providers. Drawing on historical context, current reproductive justice issues, and evolving societal attitudes towards individuals with intellectual disabilities, this essay argues for a semi-discrete model that recognizes the need to prioritize patient health and safety while valuing their autonomy. By examining the implications of both past and present practices, this study highlights the necessity for healthcare providers to navigate these dilemmas thoughtfully and compassionately, advocating for the rights of individuals with intellectual disabilities to access appropriate reproductive health care.
Recommended Citation
Savitri, K. (2025). The Ethical Justification of Application of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Patients with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Health Ethics, 21(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.18785/jhe.2101.08DOI Link
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Family Practice Nursing Commons, Maternal, Child Health and Neonatal Nursing Commons, Nursing Midwifery Commons, Other Nursing Commons
