Date of Award
Honors College Thesis
Joshua Hill, Ph.D.
The purpose of this study was to explore the progression and potential improvement of forensic science in court. Errors is forensic science have contributed to the problem of wrongful convictions, but research surrounding forensic expert testimony over the last decade is lacking. The way that an expert explains evidence in court is important to gain a broader understanding for how forensic science may fail. The testimonies of forensic experts were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively to further understand the shortcomings in the field at the end of its journey through the criminal justice system. The results showed that the testimonies included a balance of technical terminology, scientific data, and simplified explanations of evidence. The balance of explanations within the testimonies is promising to reaching a level of validity and credibility in the field.
Copyright for this thesis is owned by the author. It may be freely accessed by all users. However, any reuse or reproduction not covered by the exceptions of the Fair Use or Educational Use clauses of U.S. Copyright Law or without permission of the copyright holder may be a violation of federal law. Contact the administrator if you have additional questions.
Gunter, Parker, "The Contribution of Forensic Science to Wrongful Convictions: An Analysis of Forensic Expert Testimony" (2023). Honors Theses. 911.