Date of Award
Summer 2017
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department
Criminal Justice
Committee Chair
William W. Johnson
Committee Chair Department
Criminal Justice
Committee Member 2
Lisa Nored
Committee Member 2 Department
Criminal Justice
Committee Member 3
Hayden Griffin
Committee Member 3 Department
Criminal Justice
Committee Member 4
Kimberly Chism
Committee Member 4 Department
Criminal Justice
Abstract
Interest groups have been prevalent in American society for decades. Much of interest groups’ (IGs) influence has been examined by their effect on decision-making. IGs’ ability to affect policy choices is undeniable both legislatively and judicially. Analyses of judicial decision-making generally focus on the use of amicus curiae briefs (ACBs) by IGs. While most analyses of IGs’ influence have been conducted using quantitative methods, few have assessed IGs’ effect on decision-making qualitatively. Although the literature on IGs and decision-making is well established among political scientists, these concepts have been discussed much less among criminologists. The current analysis fill this void by conducting a qualitative content analysis of ACBs submitted by IGs working to reform corrections through USSC litigation. By doing so, this analysis more exhaustively identifies IGs involved in corrections reform and their stances on various issues. Additionally, this approach provides a more in depth understanding of how and why ACBs have been an effective strategy for IGs.
ORCID ID
0000-0003-2659-9413
Copyright
2017, James M.A. Pitts
Recommended Citation
Pitts, James M. A., "Third Party Reforms In Corrections: A Qualitative Analysis Of Interest Groups’ Effectiveness At Reducing Entropy Using Litigation" (2017). Dissertations. 1446.
https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1446