Date of Award
Spring 5-2013
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department
Communication Studies
School
Communication
Committee Chair
Lawrence Hosman
Committee Chair Department
Communication Studies
Committee Member 2
Wendy Atkins-Sayre
Committee Member 2 Department
Communication Studies
Committee Member 3
Steven Venette
Committee Member 3 Department
Communication Studies
Committee Member 4
Richard Conville
Committee Member 4 Department
Communication Studies
Committee Member 5
John Meyer
Committee Member 5 Department
Communication Studies
Abstract
This study advances understanding of powerful and powerless language effects by incorporating a relational framing perspective. Relational framing theory (RFT) suggests that when messages are interpreted using a dominance frame, issues regarding persuasion, influence, and control become salient. When exchanges are framed by affiliation, however, issues of liking, attraction, and regard become salient. Power of speech style researchers have instantiated dominance-framed interactions in their experiments primarily, thus leaving affiliation-framed interactions largely ignored. Addressing this gap, this study considered the effects of relational framing differences on participants’ evaluation of speech style variations. Consistent with previous literature and in partial support for the RFT derived hypotheses, this study found that when the exchange was framed by domination, powerless language negatively affected speakers’ superiority, general control, dynamism, and control over outcome. However, effects were much less apparent when exchanges were framed more by affiliation than domination. These findings warrant further investigation concerning when exactly powerless and powerful language effects exist in day-to-day interactions.
Copyright
2013, Michael Lewis King
Recommended Citation
King, Michael Lewis, "Power of Speech Styles: A Relational Framing Perspective" (2013). Dissertations. 677.
https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/677
Included in
Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons