Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-2017
Department
Biological Sciences
School
Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences
Abstract
Resource quantity and quality are fundamental bottom-up constraints on consumers. Best understood in autotroph-based systems, co-occurrence of these constraints may be common but remains poorly studied in detrital-based systems. Here, we used a laboratory growth experiment to test limitation of the detritivorous caddisfly larvae Pycnopsyche lepida across a concurrent gradient of oak litter quantity (food supply) and quality (phosphorus : carbon [P:C ratios]). Growth increased simultaneously with quantity and quality, indicating co-limitation across the resource gradients. We merged approaches of ecological stoichiometry and co-limitation theory, showing how co-limitation reflected shifts in C and P acquisition throughout homeostatic regulation. Increased growth was best explained by elevated consumption rates and improved P assimilation, which both increased with elevated quantity and quality. Notably, C assimilation efficiencies remained unchanged and achieved maximum 18% at low quantity despite pronounced C limitation. Detrital C recalcitrance and substantive post-assimilatory C losses probably set a minimum quantity threshold to achieve positive C balance. Above this threshold, greater quality enhanced larval growth probably by improving P assimilation toward P-intensive growth. We suggest this interplay of C and P acquisition contributes to detritivore co-limitation, highlighting quantity and quality as potential simultaneous bottom-up controls in detrital-based ecosystems, including under anthropogenic change like nutrient enrichment.
Publication Title
Ecology
Volume
98
Issue
12
First Page
2995
Last Page
3002
Recommended Citation
Halvorson, H. M.,
Sperfeld, E.,
Evans-White, M. A.
(2017). Quantity and Quality Limit Detritivore Growth: Mechanisms Revealed by Ecological Stoichiometry and Co-Limitation Theory. Ecology, 98(12), 2995-3002.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/14896
Appendix S1
Comments
Copyright by the Ecological Society of America