An Evaluation of the Relative Effectiveness of Function-Based Consequent and Antecedent Interventions in a Preschool Setting
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-27-2017
Department
Psychology
Abstract
Although there is substantial functional behavioral assessment (FBA) literature suggesting that function-based interventions are effective for improving problem behavior, only a limited number of studies have examined the effectiveness of function-based antecedent versus consequent interventions. Additionally, although there has been a recent increase in the number of studies conducted in the K–12 school setting, only a limited number of studies have included children in the preschool setting. The present study extends existing literature by examining the effectiveness of function-based antecedent versus consequent interventions for reducing problem behavior and increasing appropriately engaged behavior for preschool children without cognitive disabilities. Following an FBA of 4 children, the effectiveness of a function-based antecedent (i.e., noncontingent reinforcement [NCR]) was compared with a function-based consequent (i.e., differential reinforcement of alternative behavior [DRA]) intervention using an alternating treatments design. Results indicated that both function-based NCR and DRA were effective for decreasing problem behavior and increasing appropriately engaged behavior, with function-based NCR being more effective than DRA for 2 of 4 participants.
Publication Title
Journal of Applied School Psychology
Volume
34
Issue
2
First Page
134
Last Page
126
Recommended Citation
von Schulz, J. H.,
Dufrene, B. A.,
LaBrot, Z. C.,
Tingstrom, D. H.,
Olmi, D.,
Radley, K. C.,
Mitchell, R.,
Maldonado, A.
(2017). An Evaluation of the Relative Effectiveness of Function-Based Consequent and Antecedent Interventions in a Preschool Setting. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 34(2), 134-126.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/15538
COinS