Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2014
Department
Biological Sciences
Abstract
Many North American blackwater rivers exhibit low dissolved O2 (DO) that may be the result of benthic respiration. We examined how tree species affected O2 demand via the quantity and quality of litter produced. In addition, we compared areal estimates of surface leaf-litter microbial respiration to sediment O2 demand (SOD) and ecosystem respiration (ER) in stream and swamp reaches of a blackwater river to quantify contributions of surface litter decomposition to O2 demand. Litter inputs averaged 917 and 678 g m−2 y−1 in the swamp and stream, respectively. Tree species differentially affected O2 demand via the quantity and quality of litter produced. Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) contributed most litter inputs because of its dominance and because it produced more litter per tree, thereby making greater relative contributions to O2 demand in the swamp. In the stream, water oak (Quercus nigra) produced litter supporting lower fungal biomass and O2 uptake rates, but produced more litter than red maple (Acer rubrum). Breakdown rates in the swamp were faster, whereas standing stock decreases were lower than in the stream, indicating greater organic matter retention. Surface litter microbial respiration accounted for 89% of SOD (6.37 g O2 m−2 d−1), and 57 to 89% of ER in the swamp. Our findings suggest that surface litter drives the majority of O2 demand in some blackwater swamps, and tree species with higher rates of litterfall may make larger contributions to ER. Forested swamps may be hotspots of O2 demand in blackwater rivers because low water velocities enhance retention.
Publication Title
Freshwater Science
Volume
33
Issue
2
First Page
377
Last Page
389
Recommended Citation
Mehring, A. S.,
Kuehn, K. A.,
Tant, C. J.,
Pringle, C. M.,
Lowrance, R.,
Vellidis, G.
(2014). Contribution of Surface Leaf-Litter Breakdown and Forest Composition to Benthic Oxygen Demand and Ecosystem Respiration in a South Georgia Blackwater River. Freshwater Science, 33(2), 377-389.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/15600
Comments
© 2014 by Freshwater Science