Strategic Best-Response Learning in Multiagent Systems
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Department
Computing
School
Computing Sciences and Computer Engineering
Abstract
We present a novel and uniform formulation of the problem of reinforcement learning against bounded memory adaptive adversaries in repeated games, and the methodologies to accomplish learning in this novel framework. First we delineate a novel strategic definition of best response that optimises rewards over multiple steps, as opposed to the notion of tactical best response in game theory. We show that the problem of learning a strategic best response reduces to that of learning an optimal policy in a Markov Decision Process (MDP). We deal with both finite and infinite horizon versions of this problem. We adapt an existing Monte Carlo based algorithm for learning optimal policies in such MDPs over finite horizon, in polynomial time. We show that this new efficient algorithm can obtain higher average rewards than a previously known efficient algorithm against some opponents in the contract game. Though this improvement comes at the cost of increased domain knowledge, simple experiments in the Prisoner's Dilemma, and coordination games show that even when no extra domain knowledge (besides that an upper bound on the opponent's memory size is known) is assumed, the error can still be small. We also experiment with a general infinite-horizon learner (using function-approximation to tackle the complexity of history space) against a greedy bounded memory opponent and show that while it can create and exploit opportunities of mutual cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game, it is cautious enough to ensure minimax payoffs in the Rock Scissors Paper game.
Publication Title
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
Volume
24
Issue
2
First Page
139
Last Page
160
Recommended Citation
Banerjee, B.,
Peng, J.
(2012). Strategic Best-Response Learning in Multiagent Systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 24(2), 139-160.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/194