Earnings Management: The Case of Other Postemployment Benefits and SFAS No. 106
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2002
School
Accountancy
Abstract
SFAS No. 106 dramatically changed the way firms account for other postemployment benefits (OPEBs). Firms must now record OPEB expenses on an accrual basis, which typically results in a much higher expense being recorded than under the cash basis method required by the predecessor standard. Most firms are not contract bound with respect to their OPEB plans and thus, may curtail employee benefits to offset the higher expenses resulting from SFAS No. 106. In addition, with the many estimates used to compute the OPEB expense and the options of adopting the standard early as well as recognizing the entire transition obligation immediately. SFAS No. 106 provided a variety of methods for managing earnings. The current study examines the financial statements of 100 firms over the seven-year period subsequent to the implementation of SFAS No. 106 to determine whether and to what extent earnings management may have occurred. The resuts suggest that, in general, firms have engaged in significant earnings management with respect to SFAS No. 106.
Publication Title
Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal
Volume
6
Issue
3
First Page
23
Last Page
35
Recommended Citation
Jordan, C. E.,
Clark, S. J.,
King, B. A.
(2002). Earnings Management: The Case of Other Postemployment Benefits and SFAS No. 106. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 6(3), 23-35.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/21310