Why Does Tourist Risk Perception Differ From Actual Risk? A Social Construction Theory Perspective
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2026
School
Marketing
Abstract
Tourists' risk assessments often diverge from objective conditions because risk perception is socially constructed rather than purely rational. Yet tourism risk research often frames this construction as a linear media-to-individual process, overlooking how meanings are reproduced through social feedback before travel. Drawing on social construction theory and the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF), this grounded theory study analyzes 47 in-depth interviews with Chinese tourists in Thailand. The findings develop a two-way construction and feedback loop model that conceptualizes risk perception as a cyclical four-stage process: media, institutionalization, internalization, and externalization. Unlike unidirectional amplification accounts, the model shows that tourists’ interpretations also feed back into societal discourse through communication and behavior, shaping subsequent narratives and perceptions. This bidirectional mechanism extends SARF by theorizing risk perception as recursive meaning construction and offers actionable insights for destination risk governance and crisis communication.
Publication Title
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
Volume
66
Recommended Citation
Lv, W.,
Zhang, J.,
Wang, W.,
Chen, M.
(2026). Why Does Tourist Risk Perception Differ From Actual Risk? A Social Construction Theory Perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 66.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/22038
COinS