An Examination of Alternate Assessment Durations When Assessing Multiple-Skill Computational Fluency: The Generalizability and Dependability of Curriculum-Based Outcomes Within the Context of Educational Decisions
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2005
Department
Psychology
Abstract
The current study extended previous research on curriculum-based measurement in mathematics (M-CBM) assessments. The purpose was to examine the generalizability and dependability of multiple-skill M-CBM computation assessments across various assessment durations (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 minutes). Results of generalizability and dependability studies (N = 104 students) suggest that relative interindividual decisions can rely on the results from 1-minute administrations for low-stakes decisions and the results of 4-minute administrations for high-stakes decisions. Moreover, absolute intraindividual decisions can rely on the results from 4-minute administrations for low-stakes decisions and 13-minute administrations for high-stakes decisions. The implications and limitations of these results are discussed. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Publication Title
Psychology in the Schools
Volume
42
Issue
6
First Page
615
Last Page
622
Recommended Citation
Christ, T. J.,
Johnson-Gros, K. N.,
Hintze, J. M.
(2005). An Examination of Alternate Assessment Durations When Assessing Multiple-Skill Computational Fluency: The Generalizability and Dependability of Curriculum-Based Outcomes Within the Context of Educational Decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 615-622.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2726