Effects of Sentencing Options and Strict/Lenient Instructions On Convicting Suicide Attempters

Authors

Lillian M. Range, University of Southern MississippiFollow
Mitchell E. Berman, University of Southern MississippiFollow
Tippins Embry, University of Southern Mississippi

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-1-2003

Department

Psychology

Abstract

Sentence and strictness of instructions influence juries' willingness to convict. To see whether this result holds for suicide attempters, 240 undergraduates read jury instructions for a suicide attempt that varied sentence (jail term, fine, community service, or mandatory counseling) and instructions, voted guilty/not guilty, and rated their certainty and effectiveness. With sentences of 25 hours mandatory counseling, or strict instructions, more respondents voted guilty. Sentence did not impact certainty or effectiveness, but strictness enhanced certainty. Overall, respondents were neutral that convicting a suicide attempter would reduce future attempts. Consistent with terror management theory, present students were willing to punish regardless of whether they thought that the punishment was preventive.

Publication Title

Death Studies

Volume

27

Issue

9

First Page

823

Last Page

834

Recommended Citation

Range, L. M., Berman, M. E., Embry, T. (2003). Effects of Sentencing Options and Strict/Lenient Instructions On Convicting Suicide Attempters. Death Studies, 27(9), 823-834.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/3145