Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2001
Department
Marine Science
Abstract
Vitellogenin (VTG) synthesis in male oviparous vertebrates is used as an indicator of environmental estrogen exposure, but the relationship between elevated VTG levels and the effects of environmental estrogens on reproductive success are poorly understood. To examine whether altered VTG expression predicts reproductive impairment, we exposed medaka (Oryzias latipes) for 2 or 8 weeks posthatch to 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 7.5 ppb of the environmental estrogen o,p ' -DDT. Fish were sampled 2, 4, and 8 weeks after hatch to examine VTG expression and gonad development. After exposure, fish were transferred to clean water, grown to sexual maturity, and placed in mating pairs. We collected eggs for 7 days and scored them for fecundity (number of eggs), fertility (percent fertilized), and hatching success (percent hatched). DDT had no effect on VTG expression after a 2-week exposure, whereas all doses induced VTG after 8 weeks. At both exposure durations, the highest doses of DDT caused a female-skewed sex ratio in adults. Gonadal feminization appeared to be progressive: some ovotestes were observed after 2- or 4-week exposure to the two highest doses, but the proportion of ovaries increased after 8 weeks. Both 2- and 8-week exposures significantly reduced fertility and hatching success at all doses, with lower doses having a greater effect after longer exposure. Fertility and hatching success were more sensitive, to estrogenic disruption than were gonad differentiation and vitellogenin expression. We suggest that VTG expression may be interpreted as a warning of reproductive consequences, but absence of expression cannot be interpreted as absence of consequences.
Publication Title
Environmental Health Perspectives
Volume
109
Issue
7
First Page
681
Last Page
690
Recommended Citation
Cheek, A. O.,
Brouwer, T. H.,
Carroll, S.,
Manning, S.,
McLachlan, J. A.,
Brouwer, M.
(2001). Experimental Evaluation of Vitellogenin as a Predictive Biomarker for Reproductive Disruption. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(7), 681-690.
Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/3851
Comments
Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives