Date of Award
Spring 5-2018
Degree Type
Masters Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Mass Communication and Journalism
Committee Chair
Fei Xue
Committee Chair Department
Mass Communication and Journalism
Committee Member 2
Lindsey Maxwell
Committee Member 2 Department
Mass Communication and Journalism
Committee Member 3
Heidi Lyn
Committee Member 3 Department
Psychology
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify and understand media’s role in meat consumption and a disassociation of meat and its animal of origin. This study questions consumer behavior based on media portrayals of meat products as well as how consumers perceive these portrayals, meat consumption patterns based on media and family influence, and the types and levels of satisfaction (ex: self-esteem or masculinity) consumers receive from meat products.
A quantitative research approach was proposed for this study. The primary research method was a survey among students, faculty and staff at The University of Southern Mississippi. A total of 366 participants completed an online questionnaire concerning media and food consumption behaviors. Results revealed that, overall, individuals who spend more time watching television and video streaming are more likely to see meat products in media, less likely to associate meat with its animal of origin and tend to eat more meat. Results also revealed that media exposure is not related to how recipients view meat as social and self-esteem requirements or desires. However, there was a strong, positive correlation between family and culture influence over meat consumption, culture meaning the mainstream beliefs and cultures of individuals. There was not a significant difference in results based on sex.
ORCID ID
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-1355
Copyright
2018, Karyn Camille Lewis
Recommended Citation
Lewis, Karyn Camille, "A Meat Paradox: Media's Role in Mitigating the Omnivore's Dilemma" (2018). Master's Theses. 337.
https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/337
Included in
Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Communication Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, Political Science Commons, Psychology Commons