Date of Award
Summer 8-2011
Degree Type
Masters Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy and Religion
Committee Chair
Paula Smithka
Committee Chair Department
Philosophy and Religion
Committee Member 2
Samuel Bruton
Committee Member 2 Department
Philosophy and Religion
Committee Member 3
Chris Meyers
Committee Member 3 Department
Philosophy and Religion
Abstract
A criterion of ontological commitment is a formal method for determining what objects or entities a theory says exists. The most famous criterion of ontological commitment was developed by W.V.O. Quine. However, Quine's criterion has been attacked for presumably not meeting his own standards for an acceptable theory. After explaining the motivation and details of Quine's criterion, I will tum to the prominent objections against his theory. I will argue that there are problems both with Quine's formulation of his criterion, as well as the interpretation of Quine's criterion as presented by his objectors. In response to these issues, I will present my own criterion of ontological commitment. I argue that my criterion of ontological commitment meets Quine's standards for an acceptable theory, but is not subject to the prominent objections that have been used against his criterion.
Copyright
2011, William Felix Suttle III
Recommended Citation
Suttle, William Felix III, "An Extensionalist Approach to Ontological Commitment: Why Quine is Mostly Right" (2011). Master's Theses. 525.
https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/525