"Multiple Species of Distinctiveness in Memory: Separating Task Distinc" by Matthew Robert Gretz

Date of Award

Summer 2019

Degree Type

Masters Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

School

Psychology

Committee Chair

Mark J. Huff

Committee Chair School

Psychology

Committee Member 2

Lucas Keefer

Committee Member 2 School

Psychology

Committee Member 3

Alan Hajnal

Committee Member 3 School

Psychology

Abstract

Distinctiveness refers to the memorial benefit of processing unique or item-specific features of a memory set relative to a non-distinctive control. Traditional distinctiveness effects are accounted for based on qualitative differences in how distinctive items are encoded at the time of study. This thesis project aims to evaluate whether a different species of distinctiveness—statistical distinctiveness—may provide a separate contribution to memory beyond traditional encoding-based processes. Statistical distinctiveness refers to the relative frequency with which a specific memory item or set is processed. The current study evaluated statistical distinctiveness through a series of mixed groups in which DRM lists were studied using two of the following three tasks to promote either shallow (“E” identification), neutral (reading silently), or deep/distinctive (pleasantness ratings) levels-of-processing followed by a final recognition test. Participants studied lists in which these tasks were used frequently (80% of lists), equally (50% of lists), or infrequently (20% of lists) which were further compared to a set of pure groups in which all lists were studied using a single task. No recognition advantage was found when tasks were completed infrequently versus frequently. Rather, recognition was greatest for the deep/distinctive task—a pattern consistent with encoding but not statistical distinctiveness.

Share

COinS