Date of Award
Fall 2019
Degree Type
Masters Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
School
Psychology
Committee Chair
Evan Dart
Committee Chair School
Psychology
Committee Member 2
Daniel Tingstrom
Committee Member 2 School
Psychology
Committee Member 3
Keith Radley
Committee Member 3 School
Psychology
Abstract
Previous tootling literature has demonstrated positive effects of the intervention when implemented in settings from elementary school (e.g., Skinner, Cashwell, & Skinner, 2000) to high school (e.g., Lum et al., 2019). Several studies have shown meaningful effects for the tootling intervention on increasing class-wide academically engaged behavior (AEB) and decreasing disruptive behaviors (DB) (e.g., Cihak et al., 2009). However, no studies in the current literature have examined the effects of the individual components of the tootling intervention on class-wide behaviors. The current study sought to examine the effects of the written component of the tootling intervention on class-wide levels of AEB and DB by comparing traditional tootling to a comparison writing procedure and a no-treatment control condition. Although this study demonstrated variable results, it is the first study to shed light on the importance of looking at the individual components of the tootling intervention. The results and outcomes of the study are discussed.
Copyright
2019, James Derieux
Recommended Citation
Derieux, James, "Is the Written Component of Tootling Effective? A Comparison of the Group Contingency to a Comparison Writing Procedure" (2019). Master's Theses. 712.
https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/712